Here are some reflections upon my first reading of Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Life Together.
"Christianity means community through Jesus Christ and in Jesus
Christ." (21)
The experiment in Christian community at Bonhoeffer's Finkenwalde Seminary
was Christocentric to the core. For him there were three essential reasons for
this. Because justification rightly understood is in Christ alone, there is no
ground upon which to seek self-justification. It follows that the only hope for
genuine Christian community comes only through the work of Christ that has
bridged the chasm between God and humanity. This in turn makes
true reconciliation possible in every human interaction. Lastly, the incarnation
of God in Jesus opened the way for humanity to be fully in Christ. As Bonhoeffer
puts it, "Where he is, there we are too, in the incarnation, on the
Cross, and in his resurrection." (24)
"God is not a God of the emotions but the God of truth."
(27)
This is just one of Bonhoeffer's statements that struck me as somewhat
provocative. I suppose this is partly due to the nature of today's
American evangelical church movement. This Christian movement of which I'm
intimately familiar is prone to expressions of passion, if not outright
emotion. So much is made of the "experience" of Christian faith that it is
easily forgotten that at its core it is first and foremost the acceptance of
the divine truth that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself. It is
adherence, or more appropriately, being adhered to the Gospel. As this truth
pervades our being it certainly will turn our emotions, our will, our heart, our
mind, everything about us toward the Cross and the Resurrection. However, the
truth of the Gospel remains even in the times when the emotions are a arid
wasteland or our will is less than fully engaged.
"Christian brotherhood is not an ideal which we must realize; it is
rather a reality created by God in Christ in which we may participate."
(30)
Wow!! What a relief it is that Christian community is not dependent on us.
There is no set established human norm of practice that, if followed precisely,
results in the achievement of perfect union with others in a corporate body of
believers. Christian community has already once for all been established by God
through Christ's appearance, sacrifice, and resurrection. We are only invited
into this brotherhood and sisterhood as disciples of Jesus to share in what God
has already created. So Bonhoeffer states that, "It is not the
experience of Christian brotherhood, but solid and certain faith in brotherhood
that holds us together....We are bound together by faith, not by experience."
(39)
"Let him who cannot be alone beware of community....You
cannot escape from yourself; for God has singled you out....Let him who is
not in community beware of being alone. Into the community you were
called, the call was not meant for you alone; in the community of the called you
bear your cross, you struggle, you pray." (77)
My observation of human nature leads me to the conclusion that some
people appear to be loners while others seem to be social in makeup. I know
from experience that my wife is much more sociable than I could ever hope to
be. But these may only be appearances. Even in her extensive web of social
interactions my wife keeps her personal time of enjoyments that are
somewhat guarded. Within my own preferred personal space I too grow hungry for
human interaction. It is precisely here that Bonhoeffer makes one of his most
profound statements about building Christian community. Yes, we are as Christ
followers "singled out." God will not allow us to hide from who we really are,
sinners saved by grace alone. We ought to grow accustomed to this aloneness
with God. Neither will God allow us as Christians to go long into a
self-indulgence of such solitude. We were saved for life together in the
fellowship of other believers. It is our calling to bear our cross in the
community of discipleship marked by pain and supplication.
"The pious fellowship permits no one to be a sinner. So everybody
must conceal his sin from himself and from the fellowship. We dare not be
sinners....But it is the grace of the Gospel, which is so hard for the pious to
understand, that it confronts us with the truth and says: You are a sinner, a
great, desperate sinner; now come, as the sinner that you are, to God who loves
you....You do not have to go on lying to yourself and your brothers, as if you
were without sin; you can dare to be a sinner." (110-111)
Few things in church life are as detached from reality than the facade of
pious Christianity that exists in self denial of the human condition. Those of
us who have seen it firsthand know well the sort of sham faith such hypocrisy
breeds. Bonhoeffer apparently had witnessed it all too often. In the
experiment in Christian community that was Finkenwalde Seminary he sought to
insure it would not be the case in their fellowship. One of the principle ways
this was done was through confession. This was a distinctive expression of the
community's accountability to one another. Confession of one Christian to
another affords the unique opportunity to "dare to be a sinner;" that is, to be
real as a follower of Christ, to be authentic as a person of faith.
These are just a few of my reflections on Bonhoeffer's description of the Christian community he and others experimented with in the Finkenwalde Seminary. What he himself characterized as "Life Together under the Word."
Steven Baker, Dean of Warren Library
Palm Beach Atlantic University
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Thursday, September 15, 2011
On Becoming a Reader at Whim
Alan Jacobs. The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 162 pp.
I distinctly remember the occasion at which I learned to read. Many warm summer evenings between the 3rd and 4th grade were spent sitting on the back porch of the farmhouse with my mother, meticulously going over the words of Poky Little Puppy. Obviously, not a very challenging book in terms of reading level or story line. It is a strange and wondrous thing what a parent can do with such meager resources when motivated by a teacher’s warning that her child is not ready for the next grade.
That a reading of Alan Jacobs’ The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction would take me back to that experience was alone a joy worth celebrating its appearance. However, there is so much more here that evokes memories of reading experience both pleasurable and painful. When I first cracked open this slim volume I was somewhat taken back by what it lacked. There was no table of contents and no index. I thought, “How is a reviewer to find her way around such a work?” Not even a forward or prologue that might offer some clue to the author’s thesis and pattern of argument. It didn’t take long to realize that these appendages so typical to academic narrative were missing entirely by design. Jacobs’ purpose in writing this book is to encourage reading for the sheer pleasure of the experience; something he calls “reading at whim.” Such reading for Jacobs is best experienced free from some self-imposed habit of routine examination of the mechanics or an over dependence on external guidance. Even the title of his book led me to assume something erroneous about the contents. At first I imagined this to be yet another lament about the state of reading in contemporary society with all of its raucous technological distractions. How surprised I was to learn Jacobs’ testimony that it was the Kindle that re-connected him with the distinct pleasure of reading for itself.
Even as I was slow to learn to read, I also have been a “slow” reader all of my life. This has been a source of some embarrassment and guilt. After all, I am a librarian by trade. What is a person who is slow at reading doing in a line of work so organically connected to the book? That has been a question that had haunted me for quite some time. I recall upon entering Northfield Junior High being assigned to Mrs. Fansler’s developmental reading class. Here I was every day in a sterile lab of special machines with 20 or so other “slow readers” reading boiler plate texts by following the light that was cast upon the page by the machine. If it wasn’t embarrassing enough being in the class itself, it was doubly so attempting to keep up with the light as it invariably would fail to stay with my own innate pattern of reading. It wasn’t that I couldn’t read or read without comprehension. It was that my reading style was not suited to the conventional patterns of pedagogy. In today’s schools I would probably be diagnosed with some sort of learning disorder. In some ways Mrs. Fansler was too determined to increase the speed of her young readers. You can imagine my sense of relief to read Jacobs' chagrin over society’s obsession with speed, especially speed reading.
If the best reading is reading at whim then Jacobs offers some wisdom from experience. Reading at whim involves slowing down, re-reading, attention, and humility. This book was a pleasure to read. It’s admonition to read what you enjoy and enjoy what you read is like unto the thought of a cool breeze on a hot summer evening with someone you love.
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Christ-First Intellectual Discipleship
Mark A. Noll. Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011. 180 pp.
Mark Noll is easily recognizable among the intellectual evangelical community as one of its most accomplished historians and profound thinkers. Even though he is so regarded in that community some have felt he was too heavy handed with his charges of anti-intellectualism among the larger evangelical community that appeared in his earlier work, Scandal of the Evangelical Mind. His new book, Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind, is unlikely to alter either of these opinions. Noll shows again his ability to wrestle with complex philosophical and theological concepts in a way that sheds new light on the path of intellectual endeavor; making the way clearer for others to follow. The brightness of the light may well be unsettling to some in the community as it exposes weaknesses in their own thinking.
The heart of Noll’s argument here is that the reality of Christ’s incarnation and work of redemption is the linchpin for all intellectual efforts that are authentically Christian. For Noll, the best guidance for such “Christ-first” intellectual discipleship is the careful explication of the classic creeds of the faith. Chapters 1-4 explicate the meaning of three major ancient creeds for clues about how to proceed with serious learning that is truly Christian. He proposes four basic methodological stances, drawn from the classical expressions of Christology, that serve as guides to all intellectual work that is genuinely Christian: doubleness, contingency, particularity, and self-denial. In chapters 5-7 Noll provides three illustrations of how this type of study might look in the fields of history, science, and biblical study. He concludes with a short chapter which is something of a doxology and an extended postscript that reflects on hopeful signs of intellectual life in the evangelical community. This book should be required reading for the faculty of any academic institution seeking to support authentically Christian intellectual engagement across the disciplines.
Scandal of the Evangelical Mind was largely motivated by the need to illuminate the impoverished state of intellectual thought in the evangelical community twenty years ago. Noll’s analysis of Peter Enns arguments as a model for authentic Christological hermeneutics reveals that he still senses a need to speak to that historical reality. Having served 30+ years at three different evangelical institutions of higher learning I can attest that the need is still apparent, even if with less intensity. The beauty of this offering from Noll is that it offers such a clear way forward for those willing to take up the call to follow his Christological paradigm for serious study in any discipline. If done from such an authentically orthodoxy stance, it may well lead to refreshing insights for both the practitioner and the larger evangelical community.
Steven L. Baker, Dean of the Warren Library
Palm Beach Atlantic University
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Maurice Coleman....the Bald Geek
http://baldgeek.wordpress.com/
Sitting in the Bald Geek presentation at SEFLIN conference.
Sitting in the Bald Geek presentation at SEFLIN conference.
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Dog attacks & fear of dogs....
Linda & I know about it. Son #3 Phillip has this fear. He was attacked at 7 or 8. About the same age as Lydia, she is going to be okay physically. Hoping she doesn't suffer with too much canine phobia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)